What is the implication of ‘free education’ in the Act?
In this technological world, many websites have introduced now that are working on many programs free by just registering yourself. Many online programs have introduced that help the students to get the education about that course free. I suggest stay at home fathers and check this page https://goodmenproject.com/parenting/the-stigma-surrounding-stay-at-home-fathers/ to approach those websites and complete your education through it.
I don’t think that free education is something that you can use for a really good profession or for receiving knowledge about the subject that you are interested in. If you don’t have a lot of money I’d recommend you to check some not very expensive, but still very high-quality programs like https://leader-education.com/onmedu/ that will give you an opportunity in your life.
Free education is often meant to imply waiver of tuition fees. But tuition fee is only a part of the educational expense, and poor families are often not able to raise other expenses needed for education. These could include textbooks, notebooks and writing material, uniforms, transportation, educational and support materials for disabled children (hearing aids, spectacles, braille books, crutches and so on), or even library fees, laboratory fees, etc., which are not covered under the tuition fee. The phenomenon of drop-outs, in particular, is related to the inability of parents to meet the educational expense of their children, often daughters, somewhere during the course of elementary education. Keeping this in mind, the Act in Section 3(2) enlarges the term ‘free’ by mandating that “no child shall be liable to pay any kind of fee or charges or expenses which may prevent him or her from pursuing and completing elementary education”. A list of free entitlements is made explicit in 5(1
