What is the future of linux in the world of synthesis?
I point out that most of the images of the titanic were calculated under linux. Linux comes as a support to make calculations at lower cost. Linux, in itself, does not have intrinsic graphic quality such as Silicons graphics. • CV: Would you be interested on professional commercial software under linux? It is clear that if softimage or flint or Maya existed under linux, the choice for this OS would be obvious. • CV: What do you think of the community of the free software and the ideas that it conveys? Philosophically it is very nice. I think that in the short run, there will be many people coming from the Unix world, who will be very disappointed by Windows NT, and linux could be an alternative. It is exactly what we did. NT was evaluated, we were disapointed by it and we turned to linux. I await a more significant commercial support under linux. At my level I seek to have drivers for the OpenGL cards under Linux; are there any? It is essential if we want to make graphic workstations f