What is the evidence that a Creationist would use to argue that creationism is a science?
Intelligent design has it’s roots in science and isn’t necessarily religious in nature. The intellectual roots of intelligent design theory are varied. Plato and Aristotle both articulated early versions of design theory, as did virtually all of the founders of modern science. Indeed, most scientists until the latter part of the nineteenth century accepted some form of intelligent design. The scientific community largely rejected design in the early twentieth century after neo-Darwinism claimed to be able to explain the emergence of biological complexity through the unintelligent process of natural selection acting on random mutations. During the past decade, however, new research and discoveries in such fields as physics, cosmology, biochemistry, genetics, and paleontology have caused a growing number of scientists and science theorists to question neo-Darwinism and propose design as the best explanation for the existence of specified complexity in the natural world. Intelligent desig
Related Questions
- Why can we all just appreciate life, nature, our wonderful planet and the beautiful people & creatures we share it with, instead of wasting time arguing Evolution v Creation?
- Are there any arguments supporting creationism which aren either logical fallacies or based on the Bible?
- Why should creationism be taught in schools?
