What is the Disinfopedias role in increasing public scrutiny?
Because of its global scope and experience with prior projects like Wikipedia and others by PR Watch, a project like Disinfopedia may be able to support the public scrutiny process more effectively than was possible with prior methods. If not, that will become obvious and a more effective successor that will serve public purposes better can evolve, learning from this project’s flaws and successes.
Related Questions
- Have you had any negative response from project developers regarding the level of public access to project files and the level of scrutiny that comes with that transparency?
- Would AirAsia/Sime post the entire EPU "approval" letter for public scrutiny?
- Are the inspection report forms available for public scrutiny?
