Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the difference of Simbeor 3DML solver with existing 3D planar simulators?

0
Posted

What is the difference of Simbeor 3DML solver with existing 3D planar simulators?

0

There are some fundamental limitations in the other 3D planar tools. Extraction of parameters of lossy lines is usually available only for one-strip and symmetrical two-strip transmission lines only. There is no multimode analysis of lossy multiconductor lines in general. Loss effects in strips and planes are usually simulated with the equivalent surface impedance boundary conditions that is only a high-frequency approximation. In addition, these tools are usually optimized for narrow-band problems with non-causal models for dielectrics that leads to poor accuracy of the reduced-order models derived for analysis of wideband circuits. Note, that problem approximation typical for so called 3D planar of 2.5D solvers is available as a special simulation option in our Simbeor 3DML solver. It provides fast and accurate solutions for structures with large trace width to thickness ratio.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123