What is the difference between proving guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” in a criminal case and by “substantial evidence” in an Administrative Hearing?
“Substantial evidence” in an Administrative Hearing means that there was enough evidence to support the reason (probable cause) for the arrest and that you blew 0.08 or greater on a validly administered breath test. “Substantial evidence” is not beyond a reasonable doubt. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is more difficult for the prosecutor to prove. It means that proof is so strong that there is no reasonable doubt that it is true.
