Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED SELF GOVERNMENT AND MUNICIPAL-STYLE SELF GOVERNMENT?

government self
0
10 Posted

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED SELF GOVERNMENT AND MUNICIPAL-STYLE SELF GOVERNMENT?

0
10

In a municipal-style of self government, governance powers are delegated by an act of Parliament and an act of the BC Legislature and have no constitutional protection. The Westbank First Nation Self-Government Act (Bill C-11) is an example of a delegated self-government agreement. Constitutionally-protected self government, like the Nisga’a Treaty, is actually passed as Canadian law, and cannot be changed unless all three parties – Canada, BC and the First Nation – agree. Constitutional protection ensures that self-governing powers established by the treaty cannot be taken away.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123