Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the difference between a live virus immunisation and a non live virus immunisation?

0
Posted

What is the difference between a live virus immunisation and a non live virus immunisation?

0

Live virus vaccines contain live, but weakened viruses. Examples include the oral polio vaccine and the MMR vaccine. Live virus vaccines actually cause an infection, but because they are weakened (attenuated), they don’t cause disease (usually). Live virus vaccines provide better immunity because the body is responding to an actual infection. Live virus vaccines should not be given to anyone with compromised immunity (e.g. babies and very old people) because there is a small risk of vaccine-associated disease in these individuals. Indeed, the only case of measles I have seen in the past 15 years was vaccine-associated. Killed vaccines contain inactivated viruses. These vaccines provide adequate protection with no risk of infection.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123