Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the Definition of Evidence-Based Medicine?

0
10 Posted

What is the Definition of Evidence-Based Medicine?

0
10

Let’s begin with the definition from Oxford’s Evidence-Based Medicine Website http://cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/ebmisisnt.html#coredef. “Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine requires the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research.” These are the left and right arms of the practitioner. External clinical evidence has a short doubling-time, and 1) invalidates previously accepted diagnostic tests and treatments and 2) replaces them with new ones that are more powerful, more accurate, more efficacious and safer. Good doctors use clinical expertise and best evidence. Neither is enough. Without clinical expertise, practice becomes evidence-tyrannized, external evidence may be inapplicable or inappropriate for an individual. Without best evidence, practices become out

0

Let’s begin with the definition from Oxford’s Evidence-Based Medicine Website http://cebm.jr2.ox.ac.uk/ebmisisnt.html#coredef. “Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine requires the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research.” These are the left and right arms of the practitioner. External clinical evidence has a short doubling-time, and 1) invalidates previously accepted diagnostic tests and treatments and 2) replaces them with new ones that are more powerful, more accurate, more efficacious and safer. Good doctors use clinical expertise and best evidence. Neither is enough. Without clinical expertise, practice becomes evidence-tyrannized, external evidence may be inapplicable or inappropriate for an individual. Without best evidence, practices become out

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123