What is the Darwinian response?
The response basically boils down to — “I can imagine that there is such a series. Therefore irreducible complexity is invalid. Therefore we should still believe in Darwinism.” It is worthwhile to reiterate that… There have been no experimental demonstrations (by Darwinians) that prove that Behe’s irreducibly-complex-structures are not irreducibly complex. All of the evidence indicates that the structures are indeed irreducibly complex. And this inference of irreducible complexity has not been falsified. There have been no experimental demonstrations (by Darwinians) that prove that the incredibly complex machines in the living cell are not irreducibly complex. All of the evidence indicates that these complex machines in the living cell are indeed irreducibly complex. And this inference of irreducible complexity has not been falsified.
