Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the complexity (i.e. the number of methods) of this approach, expressed in “big O” notation?

0
Posted

What is the complexity (i.e. the number of methods) of this approach, expressed in “big O” notation?

0

f(n) = n*(n-1) = n2-n. The dominating term is n2, therefore the number of methods is in O(n2). The size of the program grows quadratically. Exercise 5a: Using this new approach, what is the minimum number of methods we need to convert between three scales? Four scales? n scales? Except for the first scale, which serves as a connection between the scales, every scale needs two conversion functions: to the first scale and back. The first scale doesn’t need any conversions. Three scales: 4 methods Four scales: 6 methods n scales: 2*(n-1) methods Exercise 5b: What is the complexity (i.e. the number of methods) of this new approach, expressed in “big O” notation? The dominating term of 2*(n-1) = 2n – 2 is 2n. Therefore, the number of methods is in O(n) and we have achieved linear growth. Exercise 5c: Draw a UML diagram of the model using the new approach. The model should have the minimum number of methods to still perform arbitrary conversions between Celsius, Fahrenheit, and Kelvin. This

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123