WHat is the best refutation of Farenheit 911?
I saw the movie this weekend. It was well received by those in the audience and I thought it was an effective statement to support Moore’s side of the argument. I suppose the best refutation of it is to go line by line and see where he has his facts wrong (you’ll never win an argument over why Bush continued to read to those kids after he was told of the 2nd plane crashing into the WTC). Start with the Carlyle Group and see if Bush and his father are really as connected to it as Moore makes it appear.
