Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is needed to indicate the basis for the petitioners belief that the dose reconstruction is not feasible?

0
Posted

What is needed to indicate the basis for the petitioners belief that the dose reconstruction is not feasible?

0

• Documentation or worker statements provided by affidavit that indicate the radiation exposures and doses of the members were not monitored, either through personal or area monitoring; • Documentation or worker statements provided by affidavit that indicate that radiation monitoring records for members have been lost, falsified, or destroyed. • A report from a Health Physicist or other individual with expertise in dose reconstruction that documents the limitations of existing DOE/AWE records on radiation exposure at the facility; or • A scientific or technical report published or issues by a government agency of the Executive Branch of Government, the Government Accounting Office, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, or published in a peer-reviewed journal that identifies dosimetry and related information that are unavailable due to either a lack of monitoring or the destruction or loss of records for estimating radiation doses of employees c

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123