Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is necessary to have in place for a CM re-accreditation survey in 2010 (CM version 4.0) as evidence for having systems in place to collect CM performance measure data?

0
Posted

What is necessary to have in place for a CM re-accreditation survey in 2010 (CM version 4.0) as evidence for having systems in place to collect CM performance measure data?

0

Response: In order to demonstrate compliance with the standard, the organization should assign at least one person the responsibility for collecting, analyzing and reporting the measures. The person’s job description should address this responsibility. The organization should also have in place a written data collection plan that identifies the performance measures including the populations and departments or programs addressed, what data is collected, what constitutes the numerator and denominator, the method(s) of calculation, and the analysis and reporting methodologies. During the onsite review, URAC reviewers will verify that the organization’s data collection plan to address the measurement standards has commenced.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123