Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is meant by the terminology, Reducing (or Oversize) and Non-Reducing (or Line-Size)?

0
Posted

What is meant by the terminology, Reducing (or Oversize) and Non-Reducing (or Line-Size)?

0

Reducing and Non-Reducing is old terminology, in this case, used for types of jacketed piping insert flanges. You do not even really need to use them if you know the flange size x core size x jacket size. However, for history’s sake, and for those who are familiar with the terms; they can be defined as follows: Reducing and Non-Reducing refer to the nominal flange size relating to the core pipe size. For example, is you need an insert flange for a 3″ flange x 2″ core pipe x 3″ jacket pipe, the 3″ flange reduces to the 2″ core, therefore, this insert flange is Reducing. However, if you need an insert flange for a 2″ flange x 2″ core x 3″ jacket, the 2″ flange does not reduce to the 2″ core since it is the same size, thus, it would be considered Non-Reducing. You can see from this example how, if you know the nominal flange size x core pipe size x jacket pipe size, there is no need to refer to the insert flange as reducing or non-reducing. We also have specific product series that help t

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123