Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is “laddering”?

Laddering
0
Posted

What is “laddering”?

0

Laddering is the technique of regularly buying and selling securities in a portfolio so as to always maintain a constant number of securities as the portfolio moves through time. The theory, for 2 for 1, is that our stocks statistically do better than the market for 2 to 3 years, based on a Rice University study. We keep 30 stocks in the portfolio (30 months = 2 1/2 years). Each month we sell the oldest “at the top of the ladder” and buy a new stock to put “at the bottom of the ladder.” This procedure eliminates the problems associated with trying to time the market and agonizing over when to sell a stock. Top of Page • Why not 3 for 2 splits? The question is, “Why don’t we include stocks that have split 3 for 2 or by some other formula?” We include 2 for 1 and higher splits (such as 3 for 1), but not 3 for 2 or lower. Our procedure is based on one basic consideration. The entire 2 for 1 strategy and procedure relies on David Ikenbery’s Rice University original study and follow-up stud

0

Laddering is the technique of regularly buying and selling securities in a portfolio so as to always maintain a constant number of securities as the portfolio moves through time. The theory, for 2 for 1, is that our stocks statistically do better than the market for 2 to 3 years, based on a Rice University study. We keep 30 stocks in the portfolio (30 months = 2 1/2 years). Each month we sell the oldest “at the top of the ladder” and buy a new stock to put “at the bottom of the ladder.” This procedure eliminates the problems associated with trying to time the market and agonizing over when to sell a stock. Top of Page • Why not 3 for 2 splits? The question is, “Why don’t we include stocks that have split 3 for 2 or by some other formula?” We include 2 for 1 and higher splits (such as 3 for 1), but not 3 for 2 or lower. Our procedure is based on one basic consideration. The entire 2 for 1 strategy and procedure relies on David Ikenbery’s Rice University original study and follow-up stud

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.