What is Dada?
According to its proponents, Dada was not art — it was “anti-art.” Dada sought to fight art with art. For everything that art stood for, Dada was to represent the opposite. Where art was concerned with aesthetics, Dada ignored aesthetics. If art were to have at least an implicit or latent message, Dada strove to have no meaning — interpretation of Dada is dependent entirely on the viewer. If art is to appeal to sensibilities, Dada is to offend. It is perhaps then ironic that Dada became an influential movement in modern art. Dada became a commentary on order and the carnage they believed it wreaked. Through this rejection of traditional culture and aesthetics the artists associated with the movement hoped to destroy traditional culture and aesthetics. According to Tristan Tzara, “God and my toothbrush are Dada, and New Yorkers can be Dada too, if they are not already.” A reviewer from the American Art News stated that “The Dada philosophy is the sickest, most paralyzing and most destru
