Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What impact would Crowns uneven-aged management philosophy have on elk and elk habitat?

0
10 Posted

What impact would Crowns uneven-aged management philosophy have on elk and elk habitat?

0
10

The same question applies to deer. (1069-15) Response: The effects of CP’s management, including their uneven-age management philosophy, on deer and elk are discussed in the Final EIS (Chapter 3 – Mule Deer Winter Range and Wildlife sections). Comment: Elk movement on the rest of the exchange does not disclose the effects to elk movement across the landscape, calving, thermal, hiding and foraging habitats. Acres exchanged do not equate to effects to the animals. (342-7) Response: Additional qualitative discussion describing the effects to elk and elk habitat is provided in the Final EIS (Chapter 3 – significant elk habitat). Fencing Comment: It is very likely that Ponderosa Pines will be fenced out of the surrounding timberland which includes affecting deer and other animal migration. (27-3, 390-3, 430-2, 1035-3) Response: Crown Pacific has publicly stated that they do not intend to fence their lands. In addition, they recently developed a proposed “Ponderosa Pines Community Interface

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123