what have the courts said over the years about such a radical concept?
Many times were told by anti-gun elements that the courts have maintained no individual right to keep and bear arms exists and we pro-gun advocates are just too stupid to understand the intricacies of constitutional law. Have the courts universally denounced the individuals right to keep and bear arms over the past 200 years and are you really too stupid to read and understand what the Constitution plainly says? To believe any of that anti-gun bilge, youd have to be terminally stupid. This month, lets read a few examples of what several courts across the country and across history had to say in the years after the Constitution was adopted. As you did last month, please judge for yourself and draw your own conclusions. One note before we start: I suspect youll never see any of these quotes or rulings either reported or cited on the evening news but that would be just a guess from my saddle ————————– 1803: George Tucker, Judge of the Virginia Supreme Court and U.S. Distr
Related Questions
- Former President Bill Clinton said Millard Fuller "literally revolutionized the concept of philanthropy." Why did he form this new organization rather than just retire?
- Does the mens rea concept affect the way the courts deal with juveniles?
- what have the courts said over the years about such a radical concept?
