What factors should an Executive agency head consider in considering whether the agencys needs can be met using alternative workplace arrangements?
Executive agency heads should consider as many of the following factors as are relevant to the agency’s circumstances: a. Facility performance and space utilization efficiency/effectiveness; b. Allocation/utilization/flexibility of space to meet diverse/changing organizational needs; c. Workspace quality factors, quality of worklife; d. Individual/organizational performance; e. Technology utilization and return on investment; f. Reduced/saved facility costs per person; g. Reduced/avoided other expenses; h. Increased/earned revenue; i. Workplace/space flexibility to accommodate/meet diverse/changing uses, configurations, staff, and/or other organizational needs; and j. Environmental impact, sustainability.
Related Questions
- Should the head of the Executive agency document the result of the agencys consideration of whether to acquire space, quarters, buildings, or other facilities for use by employees?
- If a federal agency contracts with a private or other entity to conduct certain activities of the agency, does the Executive Order apply to the activities of the contractor?
- What factors should an Executive agency head consider in considering whether the agencys needs can be met using alternative workplace arrangements?
