What evidence would it take to persuade skeptics to think again?
The demonstration of the plausibility of the current evidence under the null hypothesis is not a formal disproof of ley line claims. However, it does make skeptics likely to consider ley line theories as unsupported by the current evidence. Most skeptics would be willing to reconsider the hypothesis of ley lines if there was non-anecdotal evidence of physical, geomagnetic or archeological features that actually lay along the paths of ley lines. Skeptics believe that no such convincing evidence has been presented.
Related Questions
- Budhists seem to think there is something non-material about the mind. But surely the mind is just the brain, or maybe a program running on the brain?
- Does anyone think that the lyrics in rap/hip hop persuade people to act in unacceptable ways?
- Why does think tank think China economy will grow in 2nd quarter?
