What Else did Congress do in HR 4472?
Congress went a bit further in responding to the situation in Denver. It included lascivious images depicting genitals and the pubic area with the other matters that had earlier triggered Section 2257. It specifically provided that this provision is prospective rather than retrospective, working only to impose the obligation on images, not otherwise governed by Section 2257, that were not produced in whole or in part before July 27, 2006. This is likely to have a restraining effect on the use of new genital images which are not accompanied by records, which is its intended effect.
Related Questions
- Internal Promotion - 2 months in but not a good fit. Another internal position came up that has been my dream position for years but that never came up before. I talked to the new hiring manager, conversation went but I do not know what to do!
- What are your views on prescription drug price negotiation as proposed in the 110th Congress (HR 4)?
- What Else did Congress do in HR 4472?
