What does the “no action” alternative include? If an agency is under a court order or legislative command to act, must the EIS address the “no action” alternative?
A. Section 1502.14(d) requires the alternatives analysis in the EIS to “include the alternative of no action.” There are two distinct interpretations of “no action” that must be considered, depending on the nature of the proposal being evaluated. The first situation might involve an action such as updating a land management plan where ongoing programs initiated under existing legislation and regulations will continue, even as new plans are developed. In these cases “no action” is “no change” from current management direction or level of management intensity. To construct an alternative that is based on no management at all would be a useless academic exercise. Therefore, the “no action” alternative may be thought of in terms of continuing with the present course of action until that action is changed. Consequently, projected impacts of alternative management schemes would be compared in the EIS to those impacts projected for the existing plan. In this case, alternatives would include m
Related Questions
- What does the "no action" alternative include? If an agency is under a court order or legislative command to act, must the EIS address the "no action" alternative?
- What is the the Article I Government Agency legislative court, the United States Court of Federal Claims?
- Should the [Revised] Act contain a legislative power for agency rules?
