What does the English Peppered Moth teach us about natural selection?
They demonstrate the fixity of species and the natural and easily understood lateral adaptation allowed within a gene pool, fully consistent with the creationist position. The structure of the moth did not change over time. This moth illustrates lateral adaptation, not progressive evolution. We may summarize the factual information about mutations in these five statements. First, mutations are harmful, since they are, by definition, copying errors. Only a perfect copy of previously existing information is desirable. Anything else is a copying error, and that means that the information will become worse, not better, over time. Second, mutations are rare and beneficial ones are unknown. You can t get better than perfection. Any copy must either remain perfect, or if a change does occur, then that change would have to go downhill. Consider these examples. What happens when a story is retold from one person to another in a string of ten people? Do we end up with the original story? If an o
Related Questions
- How does evolution through natural selection result in changes in biodiversity through the increase or decrease genetic diversity within a population?
- Does the peppered moth example prove that natural selection can create anything that is not already in existence?
- Why is the peppered moth given as an example of natural selection or evolution?
