What does it take to demonstrate satisfactory psychokinesis or telepathy?
What is satisfactory for one observer can always be faulted by someone who was not present; the ease with which one person calls another a liar or gullible is a real problem for humanity. Is there any modification of the phenomena in the presence of a skeptical attitude? This seems to depend on the perceptions of the person responsible for the paranormal event. Even when the witness has, on occasions, bent metal paranormally or witnessed materializations, a poor relationship with the intended psychic will still drive the phenomena to present in ambiguous circumstances. It must be said that there does seem to be an intelligent aspect intrinsic to these phenomena; take for example remote viewing by map coordinate or direct writing. The teleportation experienced by Uri Geller seemed to be an expression of his frustration at being unable to break away from Dr Puharich. Puharich sets out his opinion about these phenomena in his book ‘Uri’. How could these things work? Perhaps these phenomen
