What do 450 peer reviewed scientific papers say against global warming theory?
It was a good try but as you have seen you will get attacked on several fronts instead of anyone actually assessing your question and those papers. All it takes is a couple of blanket statements, a wave of the hand and everything you have pointed out can be dismissed. That’s the way their machine works and the minions here are just ground soldiers following orders. Okay, I stand corrected by Pegminer who actually reponds. Although I still don’t agree with Pegminer about just calling a journal junk. Didn’t you read those leaked emails? How can you trust anything to do with the expression “peer review” in climate science? And that’s not even touching on the aspect of where the funding is coming from for any climate study and what the “expected” results should be. Yeah, call me a conspiracy theorist but try tell me with a straight face that an equal effort has been given to properly investigating all possible causes of warming and that study results that come in for AGW don’t lead to more
