Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What different approaches could a forest manager take towards assessing windthrow hazard?

0
0 Posted

What different approaches could a forest manager take towards assessing windthrow hazard?

0
0

• There are three basic approaches to windthrow risk assessment: observational, mechanical, and empirical. • Observational approaches use a checklist of indicators. • Mechanical approaches predict the critical windspeed for overturning from winching and wind tunnel studies, and the probability of critical wind speed from wind mapping/modelling work. • Empirical approaches use regression techniques to predict the probability of damage as a function of environmental and management variables. • The diagnostic method described below is ‘observational’ but includes some elements of the empirical approach. The British system is an advanced example of the mechanical approach. It was developed for Sitka spruce plantations in upland Britain and based on winching tests, wind tunnel work with whole tree crowns, wind mapping using tatter flags. Their work allows prediction of stand height at which endemic winds will produce critical turning moments and trees will fail. Note orientation of trees bl

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123