Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What difference do you think would Netaji have made if he had been present after Indian Independence?

0
Posted

What difference do you think would Netaji have made if he had been present after Indian Independence?

0

You can speculate what role he would have played if he were around but he definitely would have played an important role. He could have been a rival to the prime ministership, which is quite conceivable. There is no point in believing that he could have worked miracles and everything would have been better. Many problems in India would have remained whether or not he was there. I guess he could have taken a strong stance against corruption. But one thing I certainly believe is that if Netaji were present in the post-Independence scene, the Pakistan problem might have been avoided. If he could have got his idea accepted, we certainly would have maintained a better relationship with Pakistan.He probably would have worked very strongly to prevent the Partition of India in the first place and may be an alliance of Gandhi and Bose could have made a difference. Gandhi was not in favour of Partition but he was left alone by all the people around in 1947. Everybody got very enthusiastic to get

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123