What did the person mean when he gave Amsterdam as an example of emergence?
– He didn’t say Amsterdam, he said Hampsterman, the man who turned into a Hamster. Technological advance will lead to decadence and self-destruction. Sort of depends where we look. Eg there wasn’t really a slave-based economy in England. Around the same time as ancient Rome England = primitive (no slaves) Rome = advanced (slaves). I do not believe that evolution follows a fixed pattern. However it is influenced by advances in technology and science but as these cannot be predicted it is impossible to tell what will happen next. Lots of diversity – like social inbreeding -A world state? -Total Globalization? One language, currency? >>> Revolution/Backlash >>> Technology, mass production, automisation, no jobs communism? (damn, wanted to avoid that.) I think the pattern is: Tribal > Slave > Feudalism > Capitalism/Communism > Anarchism > Tribal State > etc. I believe it is a circle. I believe our curiosity will destroy us. Even if 1% of our research is disastrous it only takes 1% to produ
Related Questions
- To meet the requirements of clause 4.6.6 that contractors shall be under the supervision of a nominated person – does that mean they have to be accompanied at all times on site?
- Does that mean Google has the technical ability to link a persons searches together and divulge them when legally required?
- What did the person mean when he gave Amsterdam as an example of emergence?
