Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What did the government claim were its interests that were so compelling, it had to ban the UDVs sacramental use of hoasca?

0
Posted

What did the government claim were its interests that were so compelling, it had to ban the UDVs sacramental use of hoasca?

0

The government defendants claimed that hoasca was dangerous to the health of UDV’s members, that UDV’s hoasca was likely to be diverted to non-religious use, and that permitting UDV’s members to import hoasca from Brazil would cause the United States to violate an international treaty.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123