What comparison method should be used in the comparison of methods experiment?
Ideally, the comparison method should be a method that is free of systematic errors, i.e., a method whose accuracy or bias is minimal. In practice, most studies involve the routine service method that is to be replaced by the new method. In such studies, the objective is really to assess whether there will be any systematic changes in test values between the “old” method and the “new” method. If such systematic changes are uncovered, then it is important to document which method has the problem. Interference and recovery experiments are often helpful for pinpointing the problem and the method at fault.
Related Questions
- How does the method of TestWeaver compare with model-checking and other formal verification methods (e.g. as used by EmbeddedValidator, SPIN and others)?
- Can you describe the study method used by TeenKorean? In what way it is different from other methods?
- What comparison method should be used in the comparison of methods experiment?
