Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What can happen legally if the Supreme Court were to turn down the writ of certiorari?

0
Posted

What can happen legally if the Supreme Court were to turn down the writ of certiorari?

0

The defendants would still have legal options, including a procedure for moving to vacate the convictions and sentences in the district court. And that would have to take place within a year after the Supreme Court decides. It would require a formalized type of a habeas corpus proceeding, called a motion to vacate judgment/conviction. It has a time limit of one year. Time limits have been imposed on almost all habeas and post-conviction litigation based on a federal law passed in 1996. We would have a one-year deadline after the conclusion of the Supreme Court process, to file an initial habeascorpus petition. There are subsequent habeas rights but the initial ones have to be filed within a year. Q: Does that mean that all and any future issues, any remaining issues of appeal, have to be presented then? A: That is correct. Q: How much does public awareness of the case and support for the Cuban Five help in gaining their freedom? A: The support has been unwavering for the Five but it ha

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123