What brands of cigarette are the least harmful?
I have to accept that I smoke filtered-cigarettes and have been looking for a new brand to smoke that is less harmful. See I started with CAMELS and recently I’ve changed to KENT which i believe to be less-harmful (or maybe it’s a propaganda bluff). Any way I am in the search of a brand of filtered-cigarettes to smoke regularly and basically these are my options because they are commercial cigarettes that I can find in any 7-eleven jaj.: CAMEL (Normals or Smooth), KENT (Blue)or Marlboro (Blue or Lights). If anyone knows anything about these brands that could advise me to make a decision, please do me the honor, and in a way i think it answers the original question, kind off.
1) I thought before this would be chocolate cigarettes. But some people say thay they bring children into the habit of holding a cigarette in their mouth, so it would not be so true: “Advocates of public health care consider candy cigarettes (cigarette sweets) one example of the way in which international trademark or copyright laws are violated to promote tobacco products to children. 1 2 People with vested interests in confectionery and tobacco have denied these claims and argued that restrictions on confectionery resembling tobacco products are unnecessary. We review recently available documents from the tobacco industry, which describe cooperation between the manufacturers of tobacco and candy cigarettes, ineffectual trademark enforcement, evidence that candy cigarettes may promote smoking, suppression of unfavourable findings from research sponsored by the confectionery industry, and successful attempts to avoid legislation or regulation.” Source and further information:
