What arguments does Pringle’s lawyer use in making her case that his arrest was illegal?
She argues that the police did not have enough individualized suspicion that the drugs were Pringle’s. Pringle did not act strangely or try to conceal the drugs. She says that once the police officer found the drugs, he should have done more to build a foundation of probable cause than simply announce that all three would be arrested unless someone confessed. She says he could have closely questioned the driver and passengers about their activities that night. Inconsistencies in answers might have yielded evidence supporting an arrest. • On what basis did the Maryland Court of Appeals rule that Joseph Pringle’s arrest was illegal? The Court ruled that Pringle’s arrest was illegal because the arresting officer did not have enough probable cause during the roadside stop to link Pringle individually to the drugs. The Court held that Pringle was too far away from the concealed drugs—which were in the back seat—to support a rational inference by the police officer that the drugs belonged to
Related Questions
- Can attorney’s fees increase on my Missouri traffic ticket case after I hire a traffic lawyer at Traffic Law Stop for my st louis or missouri traffic ticket?
- Can a lawyer make a difference in how long the government takes to decide my case?
- What will happen in case of an illegal use of Olympic symbols?
