Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are your thoughts and recommendations on plain text vs. graphically based/HTML enewsletters?

0
Posted

What are your thoughts and recommendations on plain text vs. graphically based/HTML enewsletters?

0

Today, the vast majority of all email clients can render HTML emails fairly well (notable exceptions being older versions of Lotus Notes and pre AOL 6.0). So whereas a few years ago the answer to the question was rather complex, today it really comes down to message purpose, subscriber preference and multipart messaging. In our experience roughly 95 percent of commercial messages sent today are sent as HTML/Multipart. • Message Purpose – However, certain types of messages can lend themselves to plain text format, including – alerts, correction/mistakes, confirmations, breaking news, etc. • Subscriber Preferences – Most newsletter subscribers today prefer the attractive nature and usability of HTML emails. But some percentage of subscribers still prefer plain text, and in certain vertical markets like software programmers, some newsletter publishers have seen as much as 95 percent of their subscribers preferring plain text. Regardless, the key is to offer subscribers the choice of forma

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123