Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are your own thoughts on the limitation of monarchism in front of a decayed and desacralised civilisation?

0
Posted

What are your own thoughts on the limitation of monarchism in front of a decayed and desacralised civilisation?

0

I would not describe myself as a complete opponent of monarchism, not least because I have closely studied the system which prevailed during the Heptarchy of Anglo-Saxon England. The kings and queens of the past were often warriors and philosophers, hardly comparable to the unworthy corpse that presently squats its rotting arse upon the English throne. It is natural for aristocrats to spring from the ranks of humanity, but when they deteriorate into dynastic parasites who maintain their grip on power by using their wealth to fund an army of paid mercenaries, it becomes a travesty and a farce. In tribal societies monarchs are duty-bound to serve their people rather than to rule over them with an iron fist, but these ‘kings’ and ‘queens’ are more often than not the strongest or most intelligent within their communities. In the animal kingdom – and I use the word ‘kingdom’ deliberately – this is known as the peck order. Thank you for this short interview, the last word is yours. I would l

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123