What are the specific research criteria used by reviewers to evaluate the work of those in the Adjunct Professor series?
The Adjunct Professor series is used for appointees who teach and engage in independent research equivalent to that required for the Professorial series. Thus, the standard used by reviewers for Adjunct Professor appointees is the same as that used for evaluating the research of Professorial appointees (APM 220), including the necessity for “great distinction and recognition nationally or internationally for scholarly or creative achievement” at the level equivalent to full professor. Appointees are expected to be PIs and to have major responsibility and leadership for their research programs. 7. How do reviewers evaluate the quality of the journals in which you publish? Are online publications acceptable? Journal quality is important, and it is definitely considered by reviewers. In some departments, the department letter lists the most important journals in the candidate’s field (‘top tier’) or discusses the relative qualities of the most common journals in the candidate’s field. The
Related Questions
- What are the specific research criteria used by reviewers to evaluate the work of those in the Adjunct Professor series?
- What are the specific research criteria used by reviewers to evaluate the work of those in the Project Scientist series?
- What are the specific research criteria used by reviewers to evaluate the work of those in the Specialist series?
