What are the specific concerns of the IRB when reviewing proposed research?
When evaluating research, the IRB utilizes the following criteria in determining whether or not to approve the proposal. The goal of research is to contribute to the general knowledge base. Proposed research will be evaluated with regard to whether or not the proposed research accomplishes this. Benefits of the research need to justify any potential risks; the riskier the research project is to the participants, the greater the amount of knowledge gained should be. Therefore, the specific research design, procedures, and materials need to be clearly articulated in the proposal so that the IRB can make a determination regarding the overall contributions of the research in light of potential risks to participants. Replication of previous research that has been done often and that has potential risks to the participants is not justified. Research projects should not harm participants. The primary mandate of the IRB is to protect participants from harm. Harm can include physical as well as
Related Questions
- What is to prevent the University from requiring researchers to pay this fee for reviewing IRB applications for research that is supported by non-sponsored funding?
- When reviewing a proposal, will the IRB consider the soundness of the research methodology?
- What are the specific concerns of the IRB when reviewing proposed research?
