What are the review criteria for SDB Archive Submissions?
Rubric for Evaluating Learning Objects (LO): 1a. The proposed LO meets the basic criteria for scientific accuracy 1b. The proposed LO does not meet the basic criteria for scientific accuracy 2a. Narrative, preplanning, and accompanying materials and methods are clearly written 2b. Narrative, preplanning, and accompanying materials & methods need some clarification (see comments) 2c. Narrative, preplanning, and accompanying materials & methods are confusing and unacceptable as proposed 3a. Sources for scientific reasoning and for materials and methods are completely listed. 3b. Sources for scientific reasoning and for materials and methods are incomplete (see comments) 3c. Sources for scientific reasoning and for materials and methods are unacceptable as proposed 4a. The proposed LO meets the basic criteria for educational relevance 4b. The proposed LO does not meet the basic criteria for educational relevance 5a. The proposed LO meets the basic criteria for pedagogical effectiveness 5b
