Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are the pitfalls of a manual migration?

manual migration pitfalls
0
Posted

What are the pitfalls of a manual migration?

0

• What are the advantages of doing an automated conversion versus a manual rewrite? Automated conversions offer several distinct advantages over manual rewrites. Automated conversions are fast. Manual rewrites can very easily take man-years to complete because the logic of the legacy code must be evaluated before it’s converted to the new language. Then, the compile | test | modify cycle begins, which can also be a lengthy process since modifications must be made one line at a time rather than across the entire body of code. Automated conversions are consistent. Multiple developers manually converting code can lead to a lack of coding consistency (e.g., different programmers will write constructs differently). In addition, the modifications may not be made consistently throughout the body of code. Automated conversions are reliable. When a conversion bug is fixed, it’s fixed throughout the entire body of code. When a bug is fixed manually (often times by multiple developers), all insta

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123