What are the other bases for pinning the Velasco administration as the root cause of FebFair intervention?
The Velasco administration is an administration steeped in various commercialization scheme and repressive policies. His administration condoned red-tagging of progressive groups and individuals and calls it a mere “exercise of academic freedom,” attempted repeatedly to discredit our Student Regent, our lone representative in the Board of Regents, and undemocratically imposed the implementation of the Large Lecture Class Policy, among many others. The issue regarding this year’s FebFair happened only during Velasco’s term. No conditions were necessary before; a dialogue with the chancellor was enough. It would not be unreasonable to conclude, therefore, that behind all these is politics. The FebFair is a potent venue for airing students’ concerns and legitimate calls. It is a venue where policies such as the Large Lecture Class Policy and Tuition and other Fees Increase can be exposed and opposed by the studentry. What was our response to the administration’s attempt to prevent the hol
Related Questions
- How can the therapeutic intervention of bed rest be both beneficial and cause potential complications for a client in the hospital setting?
- If the JMML is cause by a mutation replacing or "correcting" that gene should cure it. How far are we from that kind of intervention?
- How to purchase a fake degree from www.diplomasupplier.com
