What are the grounds for non-execution that have been wrongly introduced by national laws?
Some Member States have added grounds for non-execution which are not provided for in the Framework Decision, in total contradiction with its provisions. For example, the United Kingdom has included in its transposition law a ground for non-execution based on passage of time and another based on extraneous considerations, both of which are contrary to the Framework Decision. To give another example, Italy, in its transposition law, prohibits surrender if the offence to which the European arrest warrant relates is political in nature.It also prohibits execution of a warrant where the victim consented to the act constituting the offence, where the wanted person is an Italian citizen and he or she did not know that the conduct in question was unlawful, where the wanted person is a pregnant woman or the mother of children below the age of three living with her (except in cases of exceptional gravity), where the offence was committed under circumstances of force majeureor by chance, where t
Related Questions
- Ive heard that the Government has introduced a new National Curriculum for babies and toddlers. What does this mean for childminders?
- Should the National Assembly for Wales be able to make laws on the freedom of persons to use the Welsh language with each other?
- How do the WTO rules impact on national laws and regulations?
