Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are the different refinement levels really doing?

0
Posted

What are the different refinement levels really doing?

0

There are two different optimization approaches available within MODELLER: variable target function method (VTFM) with conjugate gradients (CG) [Šali & Blundell, 1993] and molecular dynamics (MD) with simulated annealing (SA) [Šali & Blundell, 1993]. They can both be done to a different degree (with more or less cycles of CG and MD, faster or slower schedule for VTFM and SA). The exact details are best obtained from the scripts themselves because a detailed description would probably be longer than the scripts. For example, the QUANTA and INSIGHTII implementations of MODELLER have these three levels of optimization: no optimization (only copying coordinates from templates and building the undefined atoms using internal geometry information from the RTF entries); only VTFM with CG; also MD with SA. Most of the time (70%) is spent on the MD&SA part. Our experience is that when MD&SA are used, if there are violations in the best of the 10 models, they probably come from an alignment error

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123