Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What Are the Dangers of Accepting Accumulated Contributions (Employee and/or Employer or Otherwise) As the Present Value of a Defined Benefit Plan?

0
Posted

What Are the Dangers of Accepting Accumulated Contributions (Employee and/or Employer or Otherwise) As the Present Value of a Defined Benefit Plan?

0

It is important to understand that most defined benefit pension plans today are noncontributory, which means that the plans are funded solely by the employer. A participant’s accrued benefits are based entirely on a plan formula that typically incorporates a participant’s final average earnings and years of service under the plan. There are, however, some defined benefit plans that are partially employee-funded through periodic contributions. Although participants always remain 100 percent vested in their own employee contributions, their ultimate benefit under the plan does not correlate with such accumulated employee contributions. Many attorneys labor under the misconception that this cash-out of the account balance of accumulated employee contributions represents the present value of the pension. Instead, it should be the actuarial present value of the accrued benefit under the plan. Generally, employee contributions represent only a small fraction of the value of any accrued benef

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123