Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are some limitations or drawbacks compared with metal foil strain gages?

0
Posted

What are some limitations or drawbacks compared with metal foil strain gages?

0

FBG patches tend to be larger, thicker, and much stiffer than metal foil strain gages. Therefore, there is more reaction force to the specimen, and FBG sensors cannot be applied to small curvatures. A great variety of metal foil rosette strain gages are available, while the few available FBG rosettes tend to be rather large. FBG sensors normally cannot provide self-compensation of apparent strain. And, of course, in cases of small test installations with small or medium numbers of measuring points, FBG solutions are more expensive than comparable strain-gage systems. Q: What are some challenges for FBG sensor data acquisition? A: A main challenge is to get high resolution, high stability, and high measuring speed simultaneously. A strain value of 1 mm/m changes the wavelength of an FBG by only 1.2 pm; that’s only 0.8×10-6 of the fundamental wavelength of 1550 nm. If a resolution of 0.1 mm/m or even 0.01 mm/m is required, such as in the building of precise transducers, then resolution a

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.