What are some examples of adverse outcomes not caused solely by an IFPM urogynecologists technical portion of a pelvic reconstructive surgery utilizing mesh?
If an eligible patient experiences an adverse outcome associated with the use of the graft insertion (mesh) requiring mesh revision, or infection, erosion, chronic inflammation, acute or chronic pain, pain with intercourse, fistula, disturbance in bowel or bladder function, or if an eligible patient experiences other adverse outcomes unrelated to the mesh insertion, such as a heart attack, stroke or pulmonary embolism during or following the surgery requiring readmission, the adverse outcome would not be caused solely by an urogynecologists technical portion of the surgery and thus the adverse outcome resulting in the readmission would not be covered by the limited guarantee.
Related Questions
- What are some examples of adverse outcomes not caused solely by an IFPM urogynecologists technical portion of a pelvic reconstructive surgery utilizing mesh?
- What are some examples of adverse outcomes not caused solely by a participating urologist’s technical portion of a robotic prostatectomy?
- Are Life-Course-Persistent Offenders At Risk for Adverse Health Outcomes?
