What are some controversial/ethical issues in science today?
Once again Jim is preaching from his pulpit. There is no scientific evidence in support of cerationism and a massive amount of convergent evidence for evolution. Science is conducted based on evidence not the rantings of some misguided person who rages against a thorough, critical, and scientifically supportable theory in favor of a belief system put in place by men 2,000 years ago who believed the Earth was flat, demons caused disease, and that magic was real. Jim bring some of your “evidence” to the table, like th Ark of the Covenant, or the Holy Grail , prove its divine, and maybe some intelligent person might actually accept your hogwash. Fundies like you are so narrow-minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.
