Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are JBs responses to common complaints about continuity changes in CHAPTER ONE?

0
Posted

What are JBs responses to common complaints about continuity changes in CHAPTER ONE?

0

Norman Osborn behind some of the other villains/threats (which Untold Tales also did, but not with known ones) JB: A “reveal”, not a change. To qualify as a “change” you must first show evidence that points to the contrary. Norman Osborn related to the Sandman JB: Again, a “reveal”. Nothing in the previous 30 years indicated otherwise. a big explosion that impacted more than just Peter, and led to Peter being in the hospital for some time. JB: A change — necessitated by the updating. Modern readers know much more about how radioactivity works than was the case in 1963. (I wonder what would have been the reaction if I had, as was briefly considered, gone with a genetically engineered spider, in lieu of a radioactive one?) the explosion also gave birth to Dr. Octopus JB: That is Ock’s origin. the burglar picked the house, not at random, but because he had a run in with Uncle Ben.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123