Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What are inter-type declarations, and why q&o doesn´t encompass them and the > >>>others two do?

encompass inter-type
0
Posted

What are inter-type declarations, and why q&o doesn´t encompass them and the > >>>others two do?

0

> >> > >>Fernando, > >> > >>”Inter-type declarations” (formerly known as “introductions”) are an > >>AspectJ term that denotes the ability of aspects to add method, > >>field, “extends” and “implements” declarations to existing types. > >> > >>In AspectJ this can only be done if you name the target types > >>and the introduced members explicitly, which is quite limiting. > >>I would rephrase Gregor’s statement as referring specifically > >>to AspectJ, not to aspects in general. > >> > >>Other languages let you use meta-variables as the names of > >>base langueage entities that are to be introduced and they > >>allow universally quantified pointcuts that bind these > >>metavariables. Thus they support quantification. Look for > >>instance at LogicAJ, http://roots.iai.uni-bonn.de/research/logicaj > >> > >>Personally I think quantification and obliviouisness describes two > >>importants ingredients for any useful approach to modularizing CCCs. > >> > >>Guenter > >> > >>___________________

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123