What are gargoyles classified as, biologically? Are physically unusual clans (such as the London clan) different classes of animal?
Greg’s answer: In my head, Gargoyles are a separate classification which (in the past) I’ve nicknamed “Gargates”. Both Gargoyles and Gargoyle Beasts evolved from this grouping, just as Primates include both humans and various apes. The Gargate-ancestor species go back to the time of the dinosaurs, so to answer your first set of questions, I’d have to ask you how you are defining the word “Dinosaur”? Colloquially, i.e. to include all species that existed during what we popularly think of as the age of dinosaurs, or are you using the term in a scientific sense, which would leave out a number of species that we generally think of as dinosaurs? As for the various clans, appearances are superficial and can be deceiving. Leo has much more in common biologically with Goliath than he does with a Lion. Zafiro has much more in common with Griff, Leo, Una and Goliath, etc. then he does with a snake. All are Gargates. None are Mammals or Reptiles or Marsupials or Birds, though they may share a few
Related Questions
- The short answer is no, they aren . They physically won even fit in each others memory slots on the board because the notch in them is in different places.
- What are gargoyles classified as, biologically? Are physically unusual clans (such as the London clan) different classes of animal?
- Why do certain sets of gargoyles have appearances so different from most other gargoyles (such as the London clan or Zafiro)?
